Mutual fund firm Pimco launched its first exchange traded fund Tuesday on the NYSE Arca
The PIMCO 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index Fund (TUZ) will track the Merrill Lynch 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury IndexSM. The ETF will charge a management fee of 9 basis points, or 0.09%. Index Universe says this is the lowest-cost fixed-income ETF on the market, undercutting the previous lost-cost leaders, the Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND), by 2 basis points (0.02%).
The bond fund giant also filed to launch six other ETFs. These will cover longer-dated Treasurys and Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, which resemble other Treasurys but adjust their principal to match changing prices.
- Pimco 3-7 Year U.S. Treasury Index Fund
- Pimco 7-15 Year U.S. Treasury Index Fund
- Pimco 15+ Year U.S. Treasury Index Fund
- Pimco Broad U.S. TIPS Index Fund
- Pimco Short Maturity U.S. TIPS Index Fund
- Pimco Long Maturity U.S. TIPS Index Fund
While today’s offering is an index fund, Pimco has said it hopes to also launch actively managed ETFs. According to Dow Jones, the world’s largest fixed-income manager hopes to use its bond-market acumen to design funds that are easier than other ETFs for market makers to traffic in, potentially lowering costs for regular investors. Barclays Global Investors’ iShare hold most of the assets in ETF bond funds with $72 billion.
The iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY), with $7 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.15% will be the largest direct competitor for TUZ.
Posted in Business, ETFs, New York, Stock Market, stocks, Wall Street
Tagged BND. Pimco, bond etfs, BSV, iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF, PIMCO 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index Fund, SHY, TUZ, Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
Research Magazine just came out with a supplement called the Guide to ETF Investing 2009. Some great articles in there.
On page 8 of the guide is a review of my book ETFs for the Long Run. The link goes to a PDF file. The article was written by Ron DeLegge, the editor of ETFGuide.com, a great resource for ETF information. I am reprinting it here because I can’t link directly to the article.
Mutual funds may have enjoyed a 65-year head start, but the interest in ETF investing by individual investors and financial professionals is blossoming. Naturally, the rise of ETFs has led to a proliferation of subject material related to this still emerging investment vehicle. ETFs for the Long Run tackles this growing investment universe in a fun, readable and easy-to-comprehend manner.
The first few chapters take readers through a brief review of how ETFs came about. Nathan Most, a product developer for the Amex was instrumental in helping to launch the U.S. ETF marketplace. Most asked his development team, “Why can’t we create a warehouse receipt which would be backed by the underlying stock in the index but trade like a share of stock itself?” His question would later be answered with product prototypes that would eventually lead to the first U.S.-listed ETF in 1993, the Standard & Poor’s Depository Receipt (SPY).
Author Lawrence Carrel writes about ETFs as being a “better mousetrap.” He argues that mutual funds are inefficient from a cost standpoint: “Funds charge their shareholders for everything that goes on inside the fund, such as transaction fees, distribution charges, and transfer-agent costs.” On top of these costs, Carrel explains that there are additional charges that erode performance such as capital gain distributions. These often have the ugly habit of surprising mutual fund investors.
Remember the mutual fund timing scandal from 2003? Carrel suggests the 2003 scandal actually helped to fuel the popularity of ETFs. As you may recall, mutual funds were accused of breaking their own rules by allowing a select group of privileged investors to late-trade and market-time within their funds. On one hand, fund companies were telling investors to be long-term investors. On the other hand, these same companies were allowing hedge funds to make quick short-term profits at the expense of long-term investors. In contrast, ETFs avoided becoming tainted by the scandal because ETF investors are unaffected by the trading activity of their fellow shareholders.
ETFs for the Long Run explains the importance of building an ETF portfolio that accomplishes a logical financial mission. Carrel cites the classic 60/40 conservative portfolio which has substantially less exposure to stocks and more exposure to bonds. He suggests an equity mix using SPY, VO, IWM and EFA. For the bond position, he uses BSV, BLV, CFT and TIP. He also throws in a REIT fund (VNQ) for non-correlated market exposure.
Toward the end of the book, Carrel considers what the future of the ETF marketplace could become. While active ETFs have yet to make any significant impact in the business, the number of active mutual funds outnumbers that of index mutual funds. Could the same thing eventually happen with ETFs? Another area of future ETF asset growth is inside the lucrative 401(k) retirement market. Millions of 401(k) investors have no low-cost investment options or diversified choices like commodities, international bonds or REITs. Companies like Invest n Retire and WisdomTree are already aggressively pushing ETF/401(k) retirement plans. As complicated as ETF investing may sometimes seem, simplicity is often best. “The basic challenge for
the individual investor is to achieve a broadly diversified portfolio for the least amount of money,” states Carrel. This book should go a long
way to helping not just investors but top-notch financial professionals accomplish this noble objective.
Posted in 401K, Business, Commodities, ETFs, Exchanges, New York, PowerShares, ProShares, Rydex, State Street, Stock Market, stocks, Wall Street
Tagged Active ETF, actively managed funds, BLV, book review, BSV, CFT, EFA, ETFGuide, ETFs for the Long Run, IWM, mutual funds, Research Magazine, Ron DeLegge, SPDR, SPY, TIP, VNQ, VO, WisdomTree